Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

Development Limited, which

is involved in the lighting

business as well as property

development,

integrated resort

development

and the casino

business. The

joint venture

will construct an

integrated resort

spanning over

2.3 mln sqm with

an estimated

development cost

of around US$1.8

bln. The highlights

include 1) Jeju’s

largest theme park

with more than 20

rides and seven

different theme

zones, 2) Jeju’s

largest adventure

waterpark, 3)

one of South

Korea’s largest

retail and F&B

complexes, 4) premium

hotels with more than 2,000

rooms, 5) full meeting and

conference facilities, 6) 1,500

luxury serviced apartments

and residential villas and

lastly, 7) a casino. Other than

RWJ, Genting SP is actively

exploring other opportunities

to develop new integrated

resorts. With a wider network,

it would be easier for the

group to attract and retain

tourists along with seasoned

VIP casino players.

Industry – Bleak Outlook

Ahead

The Asian gaming

industry is experiencing

tough times thanks to China’s

anti-corruption crackdown and

slowing economic growth. The

Chinese authorities have also

tightened capital controls over

the past few months, which

has affected the ability of VIP

players to pay the casinos and

junkets. In addition, there are

new casino projects in Macau,

South Korea, the Philippines,

Australia and others which

will intensify competition. In

Singapore, the moratorium for

the third integrated resort will

end in 2017. That said, there

is no official indication that a

third license will be issued in

the near term.

Las Vegas Sands

Corporation (LVS) operates

the Marina Bay Sands

(MBS) Integrated Resort in

Singapore, which is the only

other local casino competitor

to RWS. MBS is upping its

Singapore market share as it

has a larger operating network

(LVS has casinos in Macau

and the US), is less reliant on

Chinese players and has been

actively marketing MBS in

nearby regions.

Company Financials –

Numbers Will Improve After

2015

Genting SP commenced

operations in Feb 2010. Its

revenue spiked thanks to its

novelty factor – see figure 1.

Subsequently, sales declined

due to the challenging gaming

industry but said decline

was partly mitigated by

improving non-gaming sales.

Administrative and selling

and distribution expenses as

a percentage of sales inched

up from 9.0% in FY2010 to

10.2% in FY2014, mainly due

to higher employee expenses.

FY2010 profitability was low

due to an S$619 mln loss

for the sale of UK casino

businesses while FY2014

results were dragged down

by fair value loss on interest

rate swap and impairment

loss on receivables. The

trade receivables profile

has worsened over the past

few years and Genting SP

has been providing more

allowance for said receivables

FROM PAGE 14

– see

table 1

. That said, there

has been an improvement

in the receivables, which fell

from S$1.1 bln in FY2014 to

S$773 mln in 3Q FY2015.

For 9M FY2015, Genting

SP incurred a S$225 mln

impairment loss on trade

receivables, a S$274 mln

fair value loss on derivative

financial instruments (a hedge

where the floating rate loans

are swapped with fixed rate

loans), a S$90.7 mln loss on

“Genting has many unique

propositions such as its

flagship project in Singapore,

its recent launch of GHJ and

its upcoming project RWJ in

South Korea. The receivables

profile is improving and we

reckon that RWS is capable of

pulling tourists to Singapore,

although the Singapore

operation is unlikely to

recover back to its PATMI

of more than S$500 mln

achieved between FY2012 and

FY2014 due to the gaming

industry slowdown and

increased competition.”

Technical Analysis

of Genting Singapore PLC

Listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange in

Dec 2005, Genting Singapore PLC’s share

price meandered around its listing price

for a year before it gaining significantly

to above S$1 when it was awarded

the Sentosa Integrated Resort project.

However, the disposal of Genting Stanley’s

betting operations and the increased in

gaming duty rate by the UK government in

2007 accompanied with the 2008 US-led

global financial crisis saw its share price fall

all the way to its listing price. In 2010, its

sterling performance in the first full quarter

of results was well received, causing its

share price to rise by 176% to a historic

high. With 2011 clouded by uncertainty in

the global economy, it has since fallen into

a descending price channel. Its rebound

from the lower boundary in late 2012 was

due to the winning of state tender for the

first hotel development in Jurong. Its weekly

MACD has been indecisive for a long while.

Source: Capital Dynamics

available for sale financial

assets (partly offset by a

S$144 mln exchange gain)

and a S$103 mln property

tax refund. Hence,

i

Capital

expects 2015 results to

be Genting SP’s worst

performance since 2011.

i

Capital expects Genting SP

to recognise lower allowance

for doubtful debt in FY2016

and FY2017, and PATMI after

perpetual securities should

exceed S$300 mln annually

after FY2018.

Conclusion

At a price of S$0.68 per

share, Genting Singapore

PLC is capitalised at S$8.22

bln. What do investors get in

return for this ?

Genting SP has many

unique propositions such

as its flagship project in

Singapore, its recent launch

of GHJ and its upcoming

RWJ project in South Korea.

The receivables profile is

improving and we reckon

that RWS is capable of

pulling tourists to Singapore,

although the Singapore

operation is unlikely to

recover back to its PATMI

of more than S$500 mln

achieved between FY2012

and FY2014, due to the

gaming industry slowdown

and increased competition.

We see the high hotel

occupancy rate and limited

casino network as their

bottlenecks. Hence,

i

Capital

rates Genting Singapore

PLC a Buy below S$0.470

which values it at 29.98 times

FY2016F P/E and 14.5 times

FY2019F P/E.

Table 1 Genting SP Receivables And Allowance For Doubtful Debts

S$ mln, FY Dec

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

9M 2015

Allowance for doubtful debt

81.70

202.6

345.7

429.4

574.3

Past due less than 3 mths

146.3

139.6

239.1

275.9

280.3

Past due for 3-6 mths

43.30

127.2

149.3

224.6

160.3

Past due over 6 months

5.800

178.5

239.5

323.1

323.2

Past due over 12 months

0

0

0

0

101.2

Amount of due receivables

195.4

445.3

627.9

823.6

865.0

Current trade and other receivables 594.0

722.0

959.5

1116

1101

772.9

Source: Genting SP Annual Reports, Quarterly Report

B

| Stock Selections

15

Capital Dynamics Sdn Bhd

The week of 21 January – 27 January 2016

Volume 27 Number 21