Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  24 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

The week of 18 August– 24 August 2016

Volume 28 Number 01

TURN TO PAGE 25

B.2. Incitec Pivot (INCITEC, IPL)

Principal activities

Manufacturer and supplier

of fertiliser, explosives and

industrial chemicals.

Major shareholder/s

Harris Associates, Schroder

Investment Management,

Commonwealth Bank of

Australia.

Latest paid-up

1.68 bln shares

Market capitalisation

A$4.81 bln @A$2.85

2016 P/E Ratio

Around 14 times @A$2.85

Sources: Incitec Pivot, Australian Stock

Exchange, Capital Dynamics

Financial highlights (A$ mln) – 30 September

2006 2007 2008 2009

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2015

Sales

1,111 1,373 2,918 3,419 2,932 3,545 3,501 3,404 3,352 3,643

Pre-tax profit

59.3 287.7 836.5 -314.6 539.9 621.4 711.7 348.8 311.7 507.7

Net profit

46.7 205.3 604.6 -221.4 410.5 463.2 510.7 367.1 247.1 398.6

Adjusted net profit

79.4 196.6 612.2 334.9 412.1 507.8 392.9 281.6 311.5 366.0

Depreciation

33.1 36.1 70.3 170.5 139.0 148.2 155.8 183.7 223.3 249.1

Finance cost

14.9 34.1 95.2 126.1 58.3 63.1 66.6 92.3 95.0 81.6

Current assets

597 909 1,867 1,034 979 1,388 1,021 1,175 834 1,344

Current liabilities

363 357 3,701 1,175 915 1,163 1,092 1,161 990 1,896

Fixed assets

441 502 1,671 1,663 1,844 2,283 2,739 3,034 3,511 4,004

Total Assets

1,305 1,639 8,185 6,590 6,310 7,002 7,013 7,684 7,970 9,196

Total Debt

437 630 2,510 1,589 1,146 1,569 1,441 1,654 1,743 2,554

Return on equity (%)

16.9 43.0 33.2 10.3 11.9 13.9 10.2 6.8 7.2 8.0

Half Yearly A$ mln

31/03/16 31/03/15

Sales

1,524.0 1,594.9

Pretax profit

22.1 186.6

Net profit

31.9 146.5

Finance cost

30.8

36.2

Depreciation 125.3 121.7

Cash & cash

Equivalents

83.0

91.5

Source: Incitec Pivot

Incitec Pivot’s Louisiana Plant – Under Construction

Figure 1 Incitec Pivot Tonnes of Urea Sold vs. Urea Price

Table 1: Global Supply and Demand of Urea (mln tonnes)

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016F

Supply

170.9

175.7

174.5

179.0

187.3

Demand

163.4

167.8

166.2

168.8

173.2

Balance

7.5

7.9

8.3

10.2

14.1

Sources: IFA, ICIS

This week,

i

Capital

updates Incitec Pivot

Limited (IPL), an industrial

chemicals company listed

on the Australian Stock

Exchange. The business

manufactures and supplies

fertilisers and industrial

explosives products and

services to the agriculture

and mining industries. IPL’s

long-term strategy is to

leverage on demand growth

for hard/soft commodities

from the industrialisation of

Asia and to take advantage

of the fall in international

gas prices due to the shale

revolution in the US. Its

strategy is predicated on its

core nitrogen manufacturing

capability, a key input in the

production of fertilisers and

explosives.

Fertiliser Business

IPL’s fertiliser distribution

business suffered its lowest

sales in recent years, with

fertiliser sales for 1HFY16

at 615,400 tonnes against

816,000 in 1HFY15. This

effect was compounded by

the continued free-fall in

urea prices in the Middle

East, incentivising farmers

to hold off their purchases in

anticipation of lower prices

in the future – see

figure

1

. This price trend is also

not expected to reverse

materially anytime soon

because the urea market

remains well oversupplied

– see

table 1.

Fortunately

for IPL, the weakening of

the A$ has reduced the

negative impact of its results.

Nevertheless, the future

outlook of urea production

at IPL’s Gibson Island (GI)

plant is bleak. The process

of manufacturing urea is

relatively simple – a plant

needs to convert a source

of carbon, whether natural

gas or coal, and combine

it with nitrogen from the air

to produce ammonia. The

ammonia is then reacted with

carbon dioxide to produce

ammonium carbonate

which subsequently turns

into urea with water as a

by-product. Hence, the

highest raw material cost in

the production of urea is the

source of carbon – which

in IPL’s case is natural gas

(~70%+).

As

i

Capital highlighted in

its previous update (see

i

Capital dated 14/12/2015),

businesses that compete

within the commodity

space are price takers,

and therefore the only line

of defence is its operating

costs. Therefore the price

with which IPL procures

natural gas is critical towards

the viability of its plants,

especially considering that

both its Australian plants

at GI and Phosphate Hill

(PH) are over 40 years old.

GI’s current break-even

cost of producing urea is

US$215/tonne, just shy

of the most recent market

price of US$237/tonne. This

cost however is based on a

10-year legacy natural gas

supply contract which expires

in Sep 2017. For GI to

remain viable, its contracted

natural gas price needs to

be less than A$6.50/mmBtu.

This is a highly unlikely

outcome due to structural

changes taking place in the

gas market on Australia’s

East Coast – see

figure 2.

IPL’s GI plant is located at

the mouth of the Brisbane

river, which is at the end of

the Moomba to Brisbane

Pipeline. This means that the

only real source of natural

gas for GI is either from the

Queensland (QLD) Coal

Seam Gas (CSG) fields or

from Moomba. The only

other potential source is

located thousands of kms

further afield down south in

Victoria’s (VIC’s) offshore

basins, making gas transport

costs prohibitively expensive.

At present, Australia’s

east coast is undergoing a

historic liquefied natural-gas

exporting boom, effectively

tripling the annual natural

gas consumption in the

region and bringing about

a structural change in the

market. The LNG is being

exported via Gladstone,

which means all gas needs to

pass through the Wallumbilla

Hub, located just hundreds

of kms from IPL’s GI plant.

Due to the sheer volume

of gas passing through

Wallumbilla for exports, the

hub sets a reference spot

price for producers selling

to the LNG gas exporters.

Given the uncertain nature

of unconventional CSG,

the mega LNG project

proponents have signed-up

long-term contracts with

other local natural gas

producers and shippers to

ensure they can fill-up their

contracts. This means that

there are even less free gas

available to be marketed

to the Australian industry

because the opening up of

the gas market to export

means that gas producers

in QLD and to some extent

the south are cognisant of

the fact that they may forego

future higher price sales

opportunities should they

agree to long-term contracts

at lower prices. The basic

economics of the plant was

predicated on low-gas prices

of a land-locked east coast

gas market.

To make matters worse,

state government’s across

the whole east coast is

placing a moratorium

on onshore oil and

gas exploration due to

environmental concerns,

further reducing the

potential for offtake funding

opportunities. Due to high

prices in QLD, Orica’s

Kooragang Island plant

contracted with BHP/Exxon’s

offshore VIC Gippsland

Basin in the south instead

of taking on supplies from

Moomba. IPL’s PH plant near

Mt. Isa, though reliant on

B

| Stock Selections

24

Capital Dynamics Sdn Bhd